Legal Opinion

In re Eaton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grand Forks County; Templeton, J. Robert A. Eaton, an attorney at law, having been disbarred by proceedings for that purpose, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.

This was a proceeding for the disbarment of a duly licensed attorney at law residing and practicing his profession at Grand Forks, in the First District. Four specific charges were made against defendant in the District Court of Grand Forks County. It appears that defendant, as attorney for the receivers of the National Cordage Company (hereafter we will not mention the receivers,) brought an action aided by attachment against Mast, Buford & Burwell Company, a Minnesota corporation, to recover a large sum of money. The papers and correspondence in the case are signed “Eaton & Higbee,” but Mr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In the Matter of EldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. People ex rel. Miller v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. In re EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tyler v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In re EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. In Re Disbarment of EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rasmussen v. ChambersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re SaddlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API