Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Eaton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Grand Forks County; Templeton, J. Robert A. Eaton, an attorney at law, having been disbarred by proceedings for that purpose, appeals.

1ConcurrenceWallin, C. J.

(concurring.) Inasmuch as the court sitting in this proceeding consisted of but two judges, I deem it proper to avow my personal views in express terms. I do not wish to amplify upon the views of my associate as embodied in the principal opinion in the case; but do desire to say that I fully concur in what is said in that opinion. The evidence in the record impresses me with the fact that the appellant, at most, has been guilty of only a degree of indiscretion and rashness which can be fully accounted for by his lack of professional experience in court practice. Aside from this one matter the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API