People ex rel. Miller v. Harvey
Illinois Supreme Court
Bulbs were entered in this court against Bufus J. Harvey and Orrin Miller, attorneys at law, to show cause why their names should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys. The facts in relation to the application are presented in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
On the eighth day of May, 1863, it being the April Term of this court, on the affidavit of Orrin Miller, a rule was entered against Bufus J. Harvey, an attorney of this court, requiring him to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorney's, for the reasons stated in the affidavit. At the samé term of this court Francis Burnap moved, on his affidavit, for a like rule against Miller. Beturns were made to both rules, consisting of various affidavits, presenting much contrariety of testimony. The charges against each of these attorneys were malpractice. That against…
2Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Jordan v. PattishallSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- In Re NovoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Moutray v. People ex rel. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- People ex rel. Deneen v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- In re EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.