Legal Opinion

Pierre v. General Accident Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas E. Mercure, J.

By this special proceeding, petitioner, Mabel A. Pierre, widow of the late George Pierre, petitions this court to vacate the decision of a master arbitrator who upheld the decision of an expedited arbitrator denying petitioner’s claim for a $2,000 insurance no-fault death benefit.

Petitioner contends that the arbitrator and master arbitrator erred by permitting respondent to introduce into evidence, over objection, as its only evidence an unsworn letter from a cardiologist who was not present for cross-examination at arbitration. Petitioner contends…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Lentine v. FundaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. In re the Arbitration between Petrofsky & Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. LombardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Pierre & General Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Snyder-Plax v. American Arbitration Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Belizaire v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API