Legal Opinion

State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. Runia

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1985No. C6-84-1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is a joint appeal by appellants Beth Ann Becker (Becker) and Larry Dennis Hills (Hills) from a declaratory judgment that denied insurance coverage to Roger Allan Runia (Runia). Becker contends that Runia was an insured by virtue of the Safety Responsibility Act, Minn.Stat. § 170.54 (1982), and under the terms of the insurance policy. The trial court held that application of the Act to the policy definition of “insured” resulted in no coverage. We affirm the trial court’s determination that the insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify Runia.

FACTS

Becker was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stepec v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Kashmark v. Western Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Oberstar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Arbella Mutual Insurance v. VynoriousMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Great American Insurance Co. v. GollaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Schumacher v. HeigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API