Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
This is an appeal by Marguth Agency and Jack L. Smith from an order of the Redwood County District Court denying their motion for a new trial or amended findings of fact in a suit for negligent procurement of insurance. The court of appeals held the trial court did not err in its determinations on negligence, causation and damages, nor in its decision to admit expert testimony. The case was presented to this court as a challenge to the constitutionality of unconditional additur in Minnesota. We see the decisive question to be whether these defendants in a second lawsuit are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Pearson v. YewdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Flamme v. Wolf Insurance AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Odden v. O'KEEFENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Daly v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.