Legal Opinion

Nona Farrar v. John McNesby

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 25, 2016No. 15-2019UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Nona Farrar, proceeding pro se, appeals from orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss her complaint. Because no substantial question is raised by the appeal, we will summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court. See Third Cir. LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6.

We write principally for the benefit of the parties and recite only the essential facts and procedural history. Farrar filed a complaint in the District Court alleging that a nationwide network of flight attendants from Delta Airlines and U.S.…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. BLANDING v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. COULTER v. COULTERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. CROOM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. GARY v. C/O ROCKSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. ISHMAEL v. GM FINANCIAL INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API