Legal Opinion

Bidnick v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 27, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

230 N.J. Super. 111 (1989)

552 A.2d 1023

ROBERT BIDNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., AND N.J. AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 29, 1988.

Decided January 27, 1989.

Before Judges LONG, MUIR, Jr., and KEEFE.

Matthew J. Connahan argued the cause for appellants (Maloof, Lebowitz & Bubb, attorneys; Catherine M. Langlois, of counsel and on the brief).

Lewis R. Shafer argued the cause for respondent (Shurkin & Fershing, attorneys; Lewis R. Shafer, on the brief).

The opinion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Fellippello v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. HannaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Damico v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Catton v. Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Miglicio v. HCM Claim Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Peprah v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API