Legal Opinion
Peprah v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 10, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
257 N.J. Super. 132 (1992)
608 A.2d 1
RICHARD PEPRAH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP, SUZUKI MOTOR CO., LTD., SUZUKI OF AMERICA AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, U.S. SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION, BELL SUZUKI, FREDERIC L. MARCUS, PENN NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., RODNEY C. JONES, NEW JERSEY FULL AUTO INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION (JUA) AND/OR MARKET TRANSIT FORMATION (MTF), JOHN DOE II-X AND JANE ROE I-X, SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Essex County.
April 10, 1992.
Steven J. Greenstein for Plaintiff (Shevick, Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna &…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kugler v. RomainSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Arthur v. St. Peters HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Kugler v. RomainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Bidnick v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- State v. AllexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miglicio v. HCM Claim Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State v. AllexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Triffin v. AMERIPAYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Rhoads v. Pottsville Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1996