Damico v. Royal Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
The issues before this court involve whether a dismissal without prejudice for failure to join an indispensable party is an appealable order and whether that party was in fact indispensable. We conclude that the trial court’s decision that it lacked jurisdiction because of the failure to join an indispensable party was an appealable order and that the trial judge correctly concluded that the party not joined was indispensable. Therefore, we affirm.
The cause of action in this case stems from an automobile accident. Appellant sought recovery from Royal Insurance Company, the only…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Mechanicsburg Area School District v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Diamond Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fisher v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Saint James Apt. Partners v. Univeral Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- John Hancock Property & Casualty Co. v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Rivello v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.