Legal Opinion

Clark v. County of Tulare

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 21, 2010No. CV-F-09-2106 LJO JLTPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

By notice filed on September 27, 2010, Defendants County of Tulare (“County”) and Bill Wittman (“Wittman”), individually and in his official capacity as Tulare County Sheriff, move for summary judgment or in the alternative, summary adjudication against plaintiff Michael Clark. Plaintiff filed an opposition on October 18, 2010. Defendants filed a reply brief on October 27, 2010. The Court then asked for supplemental briefing on an evidentiary issue. Plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adams v. Adams (In re Adams)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
  2. GemCap Lending, LLC v. Quarles & Brady, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  3. Obesity Research Inst., LLC v. Fiber Research Int'l, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  5. (PC) Sharp v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API