Legal Opinion

State v. Zeisner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 3, 1975No. 32-74, 33-74PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

Respondent was tried by jury on two informations charging violations of 13 V.S.A. § 2002, on October 6, 1969, by designedly issuing two separate checks, drawn on the Hamden National Bank of Hamden, Conn., with intent to defraud because he knew he was not entitled to draw for the sum specified, and obtaining from one Hammang the discharge of debts over $25.00 in value. Dated that same day, the checks were matured, and a false token within the definition of 13 V.S.A. § 2003 if such knowledge of lack of entitlement existed. Convicted, he appeals.

The activities of the parties related to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. State v. LevineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  3. State v. KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  4. Mollar v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. State v. McMannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodmansee v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  2. State v. GortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. State v. FoleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. State v. BatchelorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API