Legal Opinion

Manuel Sanchez-Castellano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2004No. 02-5081PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Manuel Sanchez-Castellano appeals the denial for untimeliness of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The issue presented in his appeal is whether, for a federal defendant who did not seek a direct appeal, the one-year statute of limitations for § 2255 cases *425starts ten days or forty days after entry of the judgment of conviction. The time for filing a direct appeal is ten days after entry of judgment, but pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4) a federal defendant can seek an extension of time — for excusable neglect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. United States v. George J. CottageCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. John Martin NobleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Jackie Humphress v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Donald L. Moshier, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Torrence Gillis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Jerome Raybon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Benitez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API