Jerome Raybon v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Jerome Raybon appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, claiming that his Michigan offense of assault with intent to do great bodily harm no longer qualifies as a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines after Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) {Johnson 2015). We conclude that his claim is not timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3).
I
In 2004, during the pre-Booker era when the Sentencing Guidelines were deemed mandatory, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 233, 125 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- De'Angelo Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Antonio BlackstoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Roy GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Jeffrey Russo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.