Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Brown Stove Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 29, 1982PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNER, Judge.

The dispositive question in this interlocutory appeal is the application of the doctrine of “former suit pending.” Defendant-appellant, Brown Stove Works, Inc.,1 is a manufacturer of cooking ranges located in Cleveland, Tennessee. Plaintiff-appellee, Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency (MDHA), is a public housing facility located in Nashville, Tennessee.

On October 5, 1978, MDHA sent Brown Stove a “Request for Price Quotation” for supplying 2,123 gas ranges. On October 21, 1978, Brown Stove returned the bid form accompanied by a letter setting forth various…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kane v. KaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mid-South Milling Co., Inc. v. Loret Farms, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cockburn v. Howard Johnson, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Corby v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Casone v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. West v. Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Estate of McFerren v. Infinity Transport, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Young v. KittrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. King of Clubs v. William GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API