Legal Opinion

Cockburn v. Howard Johnson, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1964PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer

There is at issue here the right of a plaintiff, in an action in personam, to file a suit in a Tennessee Court, having jurisdiction, where plaintiff already has pending in a United States District Court located in Tennessee a suit involving the same parties and the same subject matter.

On 18 October 1963 plaintiff, Grover Cockburn, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division, against defendants, Boosevelt Buchanan, Howard Johnson’s, Inc. and Hertz Corporation. On 13 November 1963, with the District Court suit still pending, plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbs v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Fultz v. FultzTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Stoll v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. West v. Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Joy Roy/Sam Dawkins v. W.T. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Brown Stove Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. City of Newport v. Masengill Auction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. Estate of McFerren v. Infinity Transport, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API