Legal Opinion

Graves v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1984No. 82-93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

While awaiting trial on murder, burglary, and robbery charges, appellant was granted use and derivative use immunity and ordered to testify at the earlier, separate trial of a codefendant. Appellant refused to testify, and the court held him in criminal contempt. On appeal, he argues that his conviction cannot stand because the only way he could adequately safeguard his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination was to remain silent. We disagree. A duly authorized assurance of immunity is sufficient to supplant the Fifth Amendment privilege because it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Pillsbury Co. v. ConboySupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Rice, Nero, Miller White & Goodson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Hicks-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hicks-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API