Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mathis

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2003No. 01-671Published

1DissentJustice Leaphart

¶37 I dissent from the Court’s conclusion that § 61-8-314, MCA, does not unconstitutionally delegate legislative authority to an administrative agency or private party.

¶38 Mathis argues that this statute unconstitutionally delegates a law-making function to an administrative agency and also to a private party. He argues that, although the legislature may delegate “ministerial functions,” it cannot delegate “law-making functions.” Setting speed limits, he asserts, is a law-making function. Additionally, he argues that even when delegating ministerial functions, the legislature must provide…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ingraham v. Champion InternationalMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Douglas v. JudgeMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. StankoMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Huber v. GroffMontana Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API