State v. Mathis
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Leaphart
¶37 I dissent from the Court’s conclusion that § 61-8-314, MCA, does not unconstitutionally delegate legislative authority to an administrative agency or private party.
¶38 Mathis argues that this statute unconstitutionally delegates a law-making function to an administrative agency and also to a private party. He argues that, although the legislature may delegate “ministerial functions,” it cannot delegate “law-making functions.” Setting speed limits, he asserts, is a law-making function. Additionally, he argues that even when delegating ministerial functions, the legislature must provide…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lee v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Ingraham v. Champion InternationalMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Douglas v. JudgeMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. StankoMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Huber v. GroffMontana Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.