Legal Opinion
State v. Stanko
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1998No. 97-486PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
¶ 1 The defendant, Rudy Stanko, was charged by a complaint filed in the Justice Court for Garfield County with failing to drive in a reasonable and prudent manner in violation of § 61-8-303(1), MCA. Following trial by jury, he was found guilty of that offense and was sentenced. He appealed his conviction to the District Court for the Sixteenth Judicial District in Garfield Comity where he was recharged by information with the same offense. In District Court, he again pled not guilty, moved to dismiss the charge against him on the basis that the statute pursuant to which he was charged was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. MartelMontana Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. StockMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TrullMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KnudsonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.