Legal Opinion
People v. Ash
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1945No. Crim. 3926PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Prom a judgment of guilty of violating section 288 of the Penal Code after trial before a court without a jury, defendant appeals.
In his opening brief defendant says:
“Briefly summarized the evidence discloses that Carol Morton of the age of five years was invited to defendant’s room, which was on the premises of his employment and where she was visiting. That while there he had her lay down on the bed where he removed her panties and used his tongue on her, indicating between her legs. That he then placed his tongue in her mouth and asked her to do the same. ’ ’
Defendant relies for reversal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. AngierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. LanhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. DabnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- People v. MorcumbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- State v. MadridIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.