In re the Issuance of Subpœnas Directed to Topliffe
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
On the taking of a deposition of an attorney as a witness, in this State, pursuant to a commission issued out of the Superior Court of Fairfield County, Connecticut, the attorney asserts the privilege surrounding confidential communications between attorney and client. The attorney is the New York attorney of the plaintiff in the Connecticut action. The attorney’s motion to vacate a subpceena served on him was denied by this court but, in his opinion denying the motion Mr. Justice Levy said: (N. Y. L. J., Dec. 19, 1947, p. 1821, col. 7): “ No ruling is made at this time concerning claimed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In re the Application for a Subpœna Directed to RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Gunn v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Fitzgerald, New York County Courts1979
- Markwell v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- In re the Application for the Issuance of Subpœnas Directed to TopliffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948