Legal Opinion

In re Canter

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to vacate a subpcena.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

This is an application to vacate a subpcena served on the applicant, requiring him to appear and be examined in this State before a commissioner named in a commission issuing out of the State of Delaware, for use in an action pending in that State. The single question up for consideration is whether the subpoena can stand and attendance be enforced, inasmuch as the commissioner named is not a resident or citizen of this State, but comes from the State of Delaware, to which he owes allegiance, for the sole purpose of executing the commission.

The question is narrow and novel, and search has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings Against SearlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. People ex rel. MacDonald v. LeubischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. In re GarveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. In re the Application for the Issuance of a Subpœna Duces Tecum to StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Application for a Subpœna Directed to RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. StarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API