Legal Opinion

Irvin v. Petitfils

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1941No. Civ. 2649PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet her title to an easement of way fourteen feet wide over defendant’s property. An interlocutory judgment was entered awarding plaintiff a right of way over the west eight feet of Veda M. Petitfils ’ property and decreeing that as soon as defendant cleared that eight feet of obstruction to travel, plaintiff’s right to the use of the fourteen feet she claimed would end and de fendant’s title to it would be quieted. We will hereafter refer to Veda M. Petitfils as the defendant.

Prior to 1925, John W. and Elizabeth Woolard owned lots 19 and 20 of the Vermont…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Corea v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Larue v. KosichArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Erie-Haven, Inc. v. First Church of ChristIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jones v. Tierney-SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API