Pure Oil Co. v. Walsh-Woldert Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the case as above).
The question presented for decision is purely that of whether or not in the’facts of the case the garnishee can be charged with liability for the indebtedness sought to be impounded. The fact was affirmatively shown that, at the time of the service of the writ of garnishment, and at the time the garnishee issued and delivered the checks in evidence, an indebtedness appeared upon the hooks of the garnishee to the credit of “Webster’s Garage, Tyler, Texas.” Inferably the indebtedness was due for wares purchased or for hiring of services by the garnishee. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gay v. . SeiboldNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
- Willis v. Lyman, Sears & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858
- Rutkowsky v. BozzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Smith Brothers v. Wallis, Landes Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dillard v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Westridge Villa Apartments v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Pellow v. Cade, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Payne v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- National City Bank v. Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.