Legal Opinion

Payne v. Lucas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1975No. 16356PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*604EVANS, Justice.

The underlying and controlling question in this case is whether a sole proprietor who incorporates his business without changing his company’s name becomes individually liable, as a matter of law, for debts subsequently contracted by the corporation unless he publishes statutory notices of intent to become incorporated.

Article 1302-2.02, Vernon’s Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated, provides as follows:

“A. Whenever any banking, mercantile or other business firm desires to become incorporated without a change of firm name, such firm shall, in addition to the notice of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. Walsh-Woldert Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Spolane v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. American Smelting & Refining Company v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Hobbs v. Triangle Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. Bevly, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  2. Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. King v. TubbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Horlock v. HorlockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Upjohn Co. v. Petro Chemicals Suppliers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API