Legal Opinion

Los Angeles City High School District v. Quinn

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7964PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment quieting the title of plaintiff to certain lands in the city of Los Angeles. The plaintiff relies upon deeds of the property, executed under escrow instructions, but not recorded. The defense in the trial court was that the defendants had not been divested of their title, for the reason that they had revoked the escrow instructions before actual delivery of the deeds.

Appellants are the four children of Catherine Quinn. Three are of legal age, and the fourth, a minor, is represented by and appears through Mrs. Quinn, his guardian. Part of the estate of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Thomas v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dyson v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. McLaughlin v. ClausenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Clarke v. Eureka County BankDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1903

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Promis v. DukeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Rifkin v. SafenovitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Holman v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Montgomery v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Todd v. VestermarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API