Legal Opinion

United States v. Harrington

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided August 31, 1984No. CM 442125PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL

SU-BROWN, Senior Judge.

What began as a routine annual qualification firing of the M-16 on the Ingman Firing Range at Camp Casey, Korea, culminated in the senseless deaths of four servicemen and serious injury to a fifth. Several of the victims fell prey to Specialist Four (SP4) Archie Bell, a mentally disturbed soldier who professed the belief that his wanton acts of violence would touch off an Islamic revolution. For his part in the killings, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. RobinsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API