Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Kirk
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.
There is involved in this record but a single question, the solution of which depends upon the law applicable to the following facts: Eastward from the city of Indianapolis for some miles, the lines of the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Louis and the Cincinnati, Hamilton and Indianapolis Railways lie parallel, and a few feet distant from each other. On the 25th day of August, 1882, Dennis Cronin was a section foreman in the service of the former, and Richard Kirk was, at the same time, in like service for the latter. Each had control of a “ crew,” a hand-car and the requisite tools for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Quinn v. . PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Gormley v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Wilson v. Madison R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by33 opinions
- Barmore v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1904
- Warner Trucking, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Cusimano v. A. S. Spiess Sales Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Cameron Compress Co. v. KubeckaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.