Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Kirk

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1885No. 11,539PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

There is involved in this record but a single question, the solution of which depends upon the law applicable to the following facts: Eastward from the city of Indianapolis for some miles, the lines of the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Louis and the Cincinnati, Hamilton and Indianapolis Railways lie parallel, and a few feet distant from each other. On the 25th day of August, 1882, Dennis Cronin was a section foreman in the service of the former, and Richard Kirk was, at the same time, in like service for the latter. Each had control of a “ crew,” a hand-car and the requisite tools for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Quinn v. . PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Gormley v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Wilson v. Madison R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Barmore v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Warner Trucking, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cusimano v. A. S. Spiess Sales Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Cameron Compress Co. v. KubeckaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API