Legal Opinion

Mason v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 25, 1949No. Record No. 3469PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

*351Henry W. Mason, Betty C. Mason, Mark A. Scott and Clara B. Scott, partners trading as Mercury Roller Rink, hereinafter called the plaintiffs, brought an action at law against the defendant, T. R. Lamb, seeking, compensation for damages done to their building and to their business by surface water which it was alleged the defendant, in filling in a depression or low area on his lot, had wrongfully deflected onto the plaintiffs’ land.

The notice of motion contained two counts: (1) that the defendant, in filling in his lot, had “obstructed” the natural flow of the surface water “in a wanton,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western R. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Rielly v. StephensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Bennett v. CupinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Third Buckingham Community, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. McGehee v. Tidewater Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Howlett v. City of South NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  3. McCauley v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Washington Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Briggs & Brennan Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  5. Mullins v. GreerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API