Mullins v. Greer
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
In this appeal, we consider the rights and responsibilities of a property owner who is confronted with surface water. The appellees 1 instituted a chancery suit against Bob Mullins to secure a mandatory injunction. They alleged that Mullins had erected an earthen embankment obstructing and diverting a stream, which caused large quantities of water to be discharged on their lands. Mullins denied the existence of the stream and claimed he properly constructed the embankment to divert surface water from his property.
After receiving the evidence, which was taken by depositions, the trial court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norfolk & Western R. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Howlett v. City of South NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Seventeen, Inc. v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Mason v. LambSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- McCauley v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Morris v. MosbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Atkins v. ParsonsVirginia Circuit Court · 1991
- Collett v. CordovanaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
- Danville Commercial Industrial Storage, LLC v. Selective Insurance Company of South CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.