Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Cupina

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1930PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The lands of plaintiff and defendants adjoin. Originally, plaintiff’s ground was the higher and the natural flow of surface water settled on defendants’ property. Later, the predecessors of defendants, as trustees of a school district, erected a schoolhouse, filled in and graded their grounds and reconstructed and elevated a driveway on their own premises abutting plaintiff’s land. As a result of these improvements, the grade has been reversed and the surface water now flows down the slope of the school yard into the driveway, thence on to plaintiff’s property and has damaged it. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Goodale v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Howard v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Buffalo Sewer Authority v. Town of CheektowagaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Switzer v. YuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Lopez v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Mason v. LambSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API