Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 27, 1984No. 83-185PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The defendant stands indicted for the felony of violating a court order that had declared him to be an habitual offender under the motor vehicle laws and had prohibited his operation of a motor vehicle. RSA 262:23. The Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) has transferred two questions raised by a motion to dismiss the indictment:(1) Is an habitual offender order valid if it rests upon an uncounselled conviction of a motor vehicle violation?(2) Is an indigent defendant entitled to appointed counsel at a hearing to determine whether he is an habitual offender?

*454We answer yes to the first question and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. State v. WestoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. State v. CanneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API