Legal Opinion

State v. Canney

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 23, 1989No. 88-449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction in the Superior Court {O’Neil, J.) based upon stipulated facts finding the defendant guilty of driving after having been certified as an habitual offender, RSA 262:19 (Supp. 1988); RSA 259:39 (Supp. 1988), and sentencing him to serve one year in the house of correction, RSA 262:23 (Supp. 1988). Although we have decided many cases involving the habitual offender statute, this case is the first involving a new procedure by which habitual offender certifications are made by the director of the division of motor vehicles, rather than by the superior court.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. O'Neill.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. O'BrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. State v. CrottySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. RixSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. State v. GrondinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. State v. RiendeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API