State v. Canney
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction in the Superior Court {O’Neil, J.) based upon stipulated facts finding the defendant guilty of driving after having been certified as an habitual offender, RSA 262:19 (Supp. 1988); RSA 259:39 (Supp. 1988), and sentencing him to serve one year in the house of correction, RSA 262:23 (Supp. 1988). Although we have decided many cases involving the habitual offender statute, this case is the first involving a new procedure by which habitual offender certifications are made by the director of the division of motor vehicles, rather than by the superior court.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. O'Neill.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. O'BrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. CrottySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. RixSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. GrondinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. RiendeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.