Legal Opinion

Flickner v. Lambert

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1905No. 5,166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Warrick Circuit Court; E. M. Swan, Judge. Action by Arthur Lambert against Arthur L.' Fliekner and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtComstook, C. J.

Appellants were engag’ed as partners in the manufacture and sale of harness, collars, etc. While in their employ, appellee, who was plaintiff below, received injuries resulting in the loss of his right hand and part of his right arm. The complaint alleges that said injuries were due to the negligence of the appellants.

As filed, the complaint was in three paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the first. The second proceeds upon the theory that appellee was at the time of his injury, by reason of his youth and inexperience, wholly ignorant of the dangers incident to the use of the steam…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rhodius v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Hodges v. Standard Wheel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Patnode v. Warren Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Haynes, Spencer & Co. v. ErkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. WorrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Grass v. Ft. Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Rose v. OwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. American Steel Foundries Co. v. CarboneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. City of Indianapolis v. MullallyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API