Bagnell v. Chemical Bank
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Saline Circuit Court. — Hon. Richard Field, Judge. (1) David A. Hancock was a competent witness as to all transactions had between him and Charles S. Bulkley as the agent of Thomas H. Bagnell, deceased, and to contradict the testimony of the said Charles S. Bulkley as to such transactions, and. as to the manner in which he held possession of the property in controversy, and therefore his testimony should have been admitted.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Saline Circuit Court. — Hon. Richard Field, Judge. (1) David A. Hancock was a competent witness as to all transactions had between him and Charles S. Bulkley as the agent of Thomas H. Bagnell, deceased, and to contradict the testimony of the said Charles S. Bulkley as to such transactions, and. as to the manner in which he held possession of the property in controversy, and therefore his testimony should have been admitted. Miller v. Wilson, 126 Mo. 48, loe. cit. 54, 55; Orr v. Rode, 111 Mo. 387, loe. cit. 398; Coughlin v. Hauessler, 50 Mo. 128; Roederv. Shryock, 61 Mo. App.…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
A judgment was rendered in the circuit court of Saline county in favor of the Chemical Bank against Charles S. Bulkley and others for $2,712, on which an execution was issued to the sheriff who levied the same on certain personal property as that of the said Charles S. Bulkley. The respondent, who is executor of the estate of Thomas H. Bagnell, deceased, made a claim in writing to the property so levied in the manner required by section 4927. The bank thereupon executed the indemnifying bond provided for in that section. Later on, the executor, as claimant, executed to the sheriff a statutory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Fitzgerald v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Chapman v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Tillman v. FontaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saville v. BradshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Samaha v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906