Fitzgerald v. Barker
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis City Gircidt Court. — Hojst. W. H. Hokhek, Judge. The paper was taken by Fitzgerald in payment of debt and in consideration of surrender of liens and the transfer was for value. Daniels Neg. Inst. [3 Ed.] sec. 827. •
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This cause comes here on appeal, and for the third time. 70 Mo. 685; 85 Mo. 13. The petition alleges that on November 2, 1872, Jno. S. Thomas and wife conveyed to defendant certain real estate by warranty deed, wherein they covenanted to warrant and defend the title to said premises against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except against the following named deed of trust and notes on said property, to-wit: Two notes of two thousand dollars ($2,000) each, payable "two years after date, and eight interest notes for one hundred dollars each, payable respectively at six, twelve,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Jackson v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Aull Savings Bank v. Aull's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Crawford v. SpencerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Hagerman v. SuttonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Borgess Investment Co. v. VetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State Bank v. FrameSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Loewen v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Fox v. WindesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Henry v. Grand Avenue Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.