Samaha v. Mason
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on appeal by one of several defendants from a judgment of tbe Supreme' Court of the District of Columbia upon a verdict of a jury in an action of replevin. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duell
This appeal is from a judgment of the supreme court of the District of Columbia entered upon the verdict of a jury in a replevin suit brought by the appellees, Edmund T. Mason & *472Co., for the recovery of goods claimed to have been fraudulently purchased by Haggar Bros & Daavid Company, who were made parties to the suit as brought, but who have taken no appeal.
The plaintiffs in their declaration claimed the return of 133 rugs, of the value of $1,947.50. A writ of replevin was issued, and the marshal took 90 rugs, valued at $1,327.50, which were turned over to the plaintiffs. All of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Walbrun v. BabbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Potter v. TaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Rindskopf v. MyersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Ray v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Premier Poultry Co. v. Wm. Bornstein & Son, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Jackson v. GoodeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946