Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanley Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1964No. Appeal, No. 30Published

1Dissent

*33Dissenting Opinion by

Watkins, J.:

I respectfully dissent. It is quite true that a private detective is engaged in a business and does not hold an “office” within the meaning of the constitution ; but it is an unusual business in that it is a creature of the legislature born by virtue of The Private Detective Act of 1953, August 21, 1953, P. L. 1273, 22 PS §11. I believe that when the legislature created this form of business it was its intention to control it by keeping exclusive jurisdiction of its regulation.

The legislature quite clearly indicated this intention by providing, inter alia,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fried Ex Rel. Berger Supply Co. v. FeolaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. United States v. SkurlaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Schmid Motor Vehicle Operator License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Gardner ApplicationLehigh County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API