Legal Opinion

Schmid Motor Vehicle Operator License Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1961No. Appeal, No. 212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

David M. Schmid was convicted of speeding in New Jersey at 82 miles per hour in a 60 miles per hour speed *121zone. Within the last few years he had had other motor vehicle law violations. After the Secretary of Revenue received notice of the conviction from the New Jersey officials, he suspended Schmid’s motor vehicle operator’s license. Schmid appealed, contending that his speed in New Jersey had been detected by radar, and that the secretary was without authority to suspend the license of an operator whose excessive speed was not determined in the same manner as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sheehy Motor Vehicle Operator License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Kerns' Appeal, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1944
  3. Moyer Motor Vehicle Operator License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yudacufski v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Marmara v. RawleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Sheehy Motor Vehicle Operator License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Stanley AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Stanley LicensePhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API