Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Albert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1936No. Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 38,523Published

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

When this ease was here in Patterson v. Albert, 267 Mich. 40, where the facts will sufficiently appear, the decree of the trial court was modified and the case remanded to amend the decree in accordance with the opinion of this court. Before the amended decree was entered by the trial court, defendant made an application for a moratorium. This application was denied, and defendant appeals.

*470The trial court held under the facts it would not grant a moratorium. The granting of a moratorium is permissive, depending upon the discretion of the court, and not a matter of right. Ciotte v. Ullrich, 267…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ciotte v. UllrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Patterson v. AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API