Legal Opinion
Day-Bergwall Co. v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed March 9, 1926:
Doerfler, J.
The statutes involved are the following: Sec. 4600 provides:
“Any person who shall . . . sell, exchange, deliver or have in his possession, with intent to sell, exchange, offer for sale or exchange any drug or article of food which is adulterated, . . . shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars, nor more than one hundred dollars, or be imprisoned in the county jail not less than thirty days nor more than four months. . . . The term ‘food/ as used herein shall include all articles used for food or drink or condiment by man,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Schmidinger v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. Interstate Blood Bank, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- John F. Jelke Co. v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Dairy Queen of Wisconsin, Inc. v. McDowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.