Legal Opinion

Day-Bergwall Co. v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 9, 1926:

Doerfler, J.

The statutes involved are the following: Sec. 4600 provides:

“Any person who shall . . . sell, exchange, deliver or have in his possession, with intent to sell, exchange, offer for sale or exchange any drug or article of food which is adulterated, . . . shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars, nor more than one hundred dollars, or be imprisoned in the county jail not less than thirty days nor more than four months. . . . The term ‘food/ as used herein shall include all articles used for food or drink or condiment by man,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Schmidinger v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. Interstate Blood Bank, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. John F. Jelke Co. v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Dairy Queen of Wisconsin, Inc. v. McDowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API