Dairy Queen of Wisconsin, Inc. v. McDowell
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Two questions are presented on this appeal: 1. Does sec. 97.025, Stats., prohibit the manufacture and sale of appellant’s product?
2. If so, is the statute constitutional?
Most of the facts were stipulated, there being few, if any, in dispute, and those not in sharp conflict. Here we have the trial court applying the law to the facts or the facts to the law, as it sees it. In such cases this court is not bound by the findings of the trial court, and the rule that the findings must be sustained unless against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence is not applicable. Will of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Will of Mechler v. LuettgerodtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Day-Bergwall Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Rigbers v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Vogt, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.