Legal Opinion
State v. Interstate Blood Bank, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1974No. State 100-102PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
The defendant contends there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction. The test on appeal of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction was recently stated in Willis v. State 4 as follows:
“. . . The test on appeal of the sufficiency of the evidence to convict is whether the ‘evidence adduced, entitled to belief, and rationally considered by a jury was sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’ The test is ‘not whether this court is convinced of the defendant’s guilt but whether the jury acting reasonably could be so convinced.’ Stating the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Chappy v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Reginald D. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.