Legal Opinion

Theo. L. Stern & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 9, 1957No. 61256; protest 285185-KPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied. The following memorandum accompanied the order denying motion for rehearing:

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest was the subject of our decision in Theo. L. Stern & Co., Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 404, Abstract 61155 (decided August 21, 1957). The ease comes before us at this time on plaintiff’s motion for rehearing.

The merchandise in question is identified herein as plastic angels, plastic dwarfs, and plastic elfs. They were classified, by similitude, as articles of cellulose ace.-tate, and are claimed to be properly dutiable as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shackman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Theo. L. Stern & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dynamic Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API