Legal Opinion

Russo v. Star Market Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 28, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. We do not consider the ground now urged by the defendant in support of its motion for a directed verdict because that ground was not stated in the motion or otherwise brought to the attention of the trial judge when the motion was presented to him at the close of all the evidence. Mass.R.Civ.P. 50(a), 365 Mass. 814 (1974). Moy v. Jack Madden Ford Sales, Inc., 4 Mass. App. Ct. 102, 107-108 (1976). Fortune v. National Cash Register Co., 4 Mass. App. Ct. 386, 386-387 n.l (1976), rev’d on other grounds, 373 Mass. 96 (1977). Parslow v. Pilgrim Parking, Inc., 5 Mass. App. Ct. 822 (1977). 2. Our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Moy v. Jack Madden Ford Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Parslow v. Pilgrim Parking, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  5. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brewster Wallcovering Co. v. Blue Mountain Wallcoverings, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Michnik-Zilberman v. Gordon's Liquor, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  3. Zeller v. American Safety Razor Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Boston Housing Authority v. BrunoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API