Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
By the first two counts of the plaintiff’s amended declaration, he seeks recovery of certain bonuses claimed to be due him under a written contract with the defendant, his former employer. By count three he seeks recovery in the same amount on a quantum meruit for the fair value of services which allegedly gave rise to the bonuses. The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $45,649.62.
The only question we find it necessary to reach is whether the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was properly denied.1 We summarize the evidence most favor*387able to the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Soares v. Lakeville Baseball Camp, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Des Rivieres v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bump v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Parslow v. Pilgrim Parking, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Russo v. Star Market Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976