Legal Opinion

Boston Housing Authority v. Bruno

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 3, 2003No. 01-P-292PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

The Boston Housing Authority (BHA) appeals from a judgment denying it possession in a summary process action and awarding possession to the tenant, Arthur Bruno (Bruno). As grounds for the eviction, the BHA relied upon a provision in the lease, which, inter aha, forbids any household member from engaging in violent or drug-related criminal activity on or near *487BHA property.1 In similar language, the lease provides elsewhere, in § 9(B), that engagement in criminal activity by the cited class of persons, including but not limited to household members, shall be grounds for eviction of the tenant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Spence v. GormleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Drury v. AbdallahMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Boston Housing Authority v. BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Russo v. Star Market Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carrel v. National Cord & Braid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Leo Bertolino, as Trustee for Leo P. Bertolino Trust, and Others v. Terence Fracassa and Frederick McDonaldMassachusetts Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API