Mateo v. Senterfitt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*516The cause of action for negligent misrepresentation is insufficiently stated because plaintiffs, who assert their claims on their own behalf and as assignees of third-party defendant Peter Skyllas, do not allege that either they or Skyllas were in contractual privity with defendant (see J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v Stavitsky, 8 NY3d 144, 148 [2007]). Nor do their allegations that defendant communicated directly with Skyllas in e-mails, representing that it was undertaking due diligence to verify that defendant/third-party plaintiff Henry Vargas owned a majority interest in 2141 MD Jr., LLC and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Prudential Insurance v. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. StavitskyNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Morgan Stanley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- US Express Leasing, Inc. v. Elite Technology (NY), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- U.S. Tsubaki Holdings, Inc. v. EstesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- U.S. Tsubaki Holdings, Inc. v. EstesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021