Legal Opinion

J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2007PublishedCited by 142 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

In this action arising out of a stock purchase transaction, we conclude that plaintiff did not raise a triable issue of fact on its negligent misrepresentation and fraud claims against defendant bank. We therefore affirm the order of the Appellate Division dismissing the complaint.

In June 1997, plaintiff J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. entered into an agreement to purchase the stock of D.B. Brown, Inc., a meat and fish distributor, from Jeffrey Stavitsky and W. Paul Brogowski. 1 The agreement listed D.B. Brown’s net worth at $2.2 million and, as relevant here,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Parrott v. Coopers & Lybrand, L. L. P.New York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Crawford v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Anschutz Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. NewSpin Sports, LLC v. Arrow Electronics, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. High Tides, LLC v. DeMicheleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API