Legal Opinion
Powell v. Central California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1976No. Civ. 14839PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARAS, J.
After trial by the court, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment that they take nothing from defendant in their action for damages and declaratory and injunctive relief.
Defendant is a federal savings and loan association chartered by the Federal Home Bank Board (“board”) and is subject to the board’s regulations. (12 U.S.C. §§. 1462, 1464; see generally, Woodard v. Broadway Fed. S. & L. Assn. (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 218 [244 P.2d 467].) On June 26, 1963, Beatrice L. Powell, the mother of plaintiff Robert C. Powell, executed an $850,000 promissory note payable to defendant and secured…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Woodard v. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.